[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8] POST/arm: adaptations needed for POST on ARM to work

[Marek Vasut]

On Tuesday, August 16, 2011 08:03:54 PM Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday, August 15, 2011 05:09:42 Valentin Longchamp wrote:
> > On 08/14/2011 09:07 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 08:37:00 Valentin Longchamp wrote:
> > >> --- a/include/post.h
> > >> +++ b/include/post.h
> > >> 
> > >> +/*
> > >> + * some ARM implementations have to use gd->ram_size, since POST_WORD
> > >> is + * defined in RAM
> > >> + */
> > >> +DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
> > > 
> > > i'm not sure about this.  no other header has been allowed to do this
> > > in the past, and i dont think we should start now.
> > 
> > OK. Then we should move the post_word_load and post_word_store function
> > to post/post.c. Would this be accepted ?
> 
> that would add overhead that most people dont need.  i guess the only other
> option would be to add a CONFIG_POST_EXTERNAL_WORD_FUNCS and then post.h
> would just define the two funcs as externs.  it'd be up to the board
> porters to define them however they want.
> -mike

We don't want externs. Why would moving it into post.c introduce any overhead ?