[U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM (Tegra)

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Le 30/08/2011 17:57, Simon Glass a écrit :
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
> <albert.u.boot at aribaud.net>  wrote:
>> Le 30/08/2011 17:20, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
>>>
>>> On Saturday, August 20, 2011 14:50:27 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, August 18, 2011 18:09:56 Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) if there are any pull requests to u-voot-arm/master in the works,
>>>>> please try to submit them soon or at lease let me know, and
>>>>
>>>> we've got some Tegra stuff that seems to be waiting for merging (or at
>>>> least feedback as to anything left that needs to be done so it can be
>>>> merged): [RESEND PATCH v3 0/4] Add basic clock and pinmux functions to
>>>> the
>>>> Tegra2
>>>>
>>>> to broach the more general tegra question, should these get sent to Tom
>>>> and
>>>> then he sends them to Albert, or should they get sent directly to Albert
>>>> (since there is no dedicated tegra or nvidia u-boot tree atm) ?  we'd
>>>> like
>>>> to get this process smoothed out so we dont keep annoying people :).
>>>
>>> ping ...
>>>
>>> if people dont care either way, we can just set up a
>>> u-boot/u-boot-tegra.git
>>> tree for Albert to pull from
>>
>> Seems like people don't care, and I'm fine with applying the patches myself,
>> but I don't want to pull from a tree: I'll apply the patches as they appear
>> on patchwork.
>>
>> Are we talking about these four patches?
>>
>> <http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/110117/>
>> <http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/110120/>
>> <http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/110119/>
>> <http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/110118/>
>
> Yes that's right, thanks.

There was a comment on 110117 (patch 1/4) from Graeme about 
timer_get_future_us() still being there despite the history. Can you 
post a V4 for patch 1/4 only with this function removed entirely (make 
sure the subject and history are up to date for V4) ?

> Regards,
> Simon

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.