[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] powerpc/8xxx: Fix LAW init to respect pre-initialized entries
Kumar Gala
galak at kernel.crashing.org
Fri Feb 4 21:43:09 CET 2011
If some pre-boot or earlier stage bootloader (NAND SPL) has setup LAW
entries consider them good and mark them used.
In the NAND SPL case we skip re-initializing based on the law_table
since the SPL phase already did that.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org>
---
* Fixed wording in comment per Timur's feedback
drivers/misc/fsl_law.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/fsl_law.c b/drivers/misc/fsl_law.c
index 63c08bf..8b37a2f 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/fsl_law.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/fsl_law.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
*/
#include <common.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
#include <asm/fsl_law.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
@@ -246,6 +247,25 @@ void init_laws(void)
#error FSL_HW_NUM_LAWS can not be greater than 32 w/o code changes
#endif
+ /*
+ * Any LAWs that were set up before we booted assume they are meant to
+ * be around and mark them used.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < FSL_HW_NUM_LAWS; i++) {
+ u32 lawar = in_be32(LAWAR_ADDR(i));
+
+ if (lawar & LAW_EN)
+ gd->used_laws |= (1 << i);
+ }
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_NAND_SPL
+ /*
+ * in NAND boot we've already parsed the law_table and setup those LAWs
+ * so don't do it again.
+ */
+ return;
+#endif
+
for (i = 0; i < num_law_entries; i++) {
if (law_table[i].index == -1)
set_next_law(law_table[i].addr, law_table[i].size,
--
1.7.2.3
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list