[U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Hi Aneesh,

Le 03/02/2011 11:38, Aneesh V a écrit :

> On second thoughts I would like to keep the entire bss in SDRAM. With
> MMC and FAT support, the SPL is already nearing the IRAM budget in
> OMAP3. It helps to save some space by moving out bss to SDRAM.
>
> If needed, I can fix up the start.S by defining something like
> _end_of_data. But is that really needed. I do not see any SPL that
> needs relocation and SDRAM bss at the same time.

"Patches Welcome" :) -- with added thanks for patching all start.S / 
u-boot.lds in the ARM arch consistently.

> Best regards,
> Aneesh

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.