[U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH] ARMV7: Patch to fix hard float build issues
Albert ARIBAUD
albert.aribaud at free.fr
Sat Feb 19 14:51:06 CET 2011
Le 19/02/2011 14:25, Måns Rullgård a écrit :
>> So whats the reasoning to use -msoft-float as it is currently done? To
>> confuse people? ;)
>
> I guess it's there to make sure no floating-point instructions make it
> into u-boot, even though floats are not used in the code. Perhaps
> someone was paranoid.
I think also that there is no choice but to have a float option for ARM
C, either 'soft' or 'hard' (or 'softfp', actually, which is 'hard' with
the 'soft' calling conventions), because the C compiler does not allow
'no floats', and anyway the C language *requires* to have some sort of
float support.
Actually if you don't specify any float option, the C toolchain will
choose one, which is just the same in the end: *some* float option is
chosen.
And since some option must be chosen, I prefer that U-Boot make the
explicit decision, and choose soft float for the reasons I already exposed.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list