[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: Add comments why -msoft-float is used.
Wolfgang Denk
wd at denx.de
Sun Feb 20 11:20:07 CET 2011
Dear Alexander Holler,
In message <4D60E16E.1060406 at ahsoftware.de> you wrote:
>
> I don't know how other the compiler behaves for other architectures and
> if those are having the need to save fp-contexts for irqs.
I thought I had explained this again in recent postings, not to
mention the times I did that before; you probably can find this in the
archives.
> # -msoft-float forces the compiler to avoid any fp-related instructions
> for optimizations.
>
> Would that be better?
No, not at all, because the only additional information about what
-msoft-float does (not using FP instructions) in the "for
optimizations" part - but that does not help much if you don;t have
the background we discussed here again.
So if you want to document this, then please provide a more complete
explanation about the reasons for using -msoft-float, summarizing the
recent discussion.
Keep in mind that it does not only apply to ARM Makefiles, but to all
other architectures as well. And instead of adding it to all ~30
affected files (which also gives no guarantee that it will be
documented in any newly created config.mk files), please add it to
some central doc file - either to the README, or feel free to create
a doc/README.toolchain or similar that can then also be used to
document things like linker options, information about known issues,
etc.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Remember, an int is not always 16 bits. I'm not sure, but if the
80386 is one step closer to Intel's slugfest with the CPU curve that
is aymptotically approaching a real machine, perhaps an int has been
implemented as 32 bits by some Unix vendors...? - Derek Terveer
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list