[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2] ARM: Avoid compiler optimization for usages of readb, writeb and friends.

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Alessandro Rubini,

In message <20101229231004.GA17999 at mail.gnudd.com> you wrote:
>
> > #define writeb(v,c)         ({ __iowmb(); __arch_putb(v,c); v;})
> > 
> > (note the additional 'v;') should result in correct code, too.
> 
> Yes, that's good. Also "0" may work, and may be more readable, (or not,
> according to who reads it).

'0' looks wrong to me, as it changes behaviour.  Keep in mind that the
previous implemention usually looks like this:

	#define writeb(val,addr) (*(volatile unsigned char *)(addr)) = (val)

The value of this should be "val", not 0.


> > #define writeb(v,c)	do { __iowmb(); __arch_putb(v,c); } while (0)
> > 
> > do the same with a slightly different syntax, so these patches are 
> > fine, too.
> 
> It's not just different syntax, it's different semantics.

This is true.  Thanks for pointing out.

> The ({...})  trick turns statements into expressions, while the "do
> {...} while(0)" does not.  I'd better not forbid statements like
> 
> 	while (reg = readb(addr), reg != VALUE) { .... }
> 
> or
> 
> 	if (readb(addr) == VALUE) { ... } 
> 
> or 
> 	swtich (readb(addr)) { ... }

Here you are mixing things up.  There is no issue with the read*()
code, only the write*() code is affected.

And while no person ion a sane mind of state should use write*() in
such a context, I agree that for the sake of backward compatibility we
should change the code.  Patch follows.

> While I agree they may in general not be clean, I can forsee
> meaningful uses. Moreover, I'd better allow expression-looking macros
> to really behave like expressions -- otherwise error messages are quite
> hard to understand for the unaquainted.

Agreed.  But the write*() "functions" are considered to return void,
so there should not be any such issues.

> IMHO, the only reason to use "do {} while(0)" over statemente
> expressions is being portable but in u-boot we are gcc-specific
> anyways.

This is wrong interpretation, too; nothing in this construct is GCC
specific.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Documentation is the castor oil of programming.
Managers know it must be good because the programmers hate it so much.