[U-Boot] [PATCH 7/7] add gc-sections to TPL boot
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Fri Jan 28 20:12:24 CET 2011
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:07:09 -0500
Haiying Wang <Haiying.Wang at freescale.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 13:46 -0500, Haiying Wang wrote:
> > > In any case, I don't think we want different behavior here based on
> > > whether we have TPL. Either LDFLAGS is used in partial linking, or
> > > it's not.
> > I don't understand why LDFLAGS was added here in patch
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-January/084705.html
> >
> > It says "LDFLAGS sets necessary option by partial linking (use in
> > cmd_link_o_target)." But without this changing, the partial linking
> > worked well before. Please correct me if I am wrong.
> >
> > So if someone can confirm LDFLAGS is not necessary to be added in
> > cmd_link_o_target, I prefer not add it here.
>
> BTW, I doubt removing --gc-sections for PLATFORM_FLAGS by patch
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-January/084705.html may have
> the risk of building failure for nand_spl, as we encountered the message
> "NAND bootstrap too big" before
Yes, I saw that as well -- we need gc-sections. It just can't go in
LDFLAGS.
-Scott
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list