[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Adds saving of Kernel boot args to NAND flash
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Thu Jul 7 18:34:26 CEST 2011
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 17:50:12 +0200
Simon Schwarz <simonschwarzcor at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > But that's not what bootm is for. If you're doing something new, it should
> > be in a new command -- or in a script of existing commands.
>
> True. The upper patch was the quickest way to do this.
>
> I implemented a first test for a command. This is a bit ugly because I
> have to rip apart bootm. For now I heavily used extern and removed
> static keywords from bootm - this is ok for the testing but not to get
> it into mainline...
>
> I'am not sure how i can handle this to get it into mainline. The main
> problem is in arch/arm/lib/bootm.c implementation:
> static void setup_start_tag (bd_t *bd);
> static void setup_memory_tags (bd_t *bd);
> static void setup_commandline_tag (bd_t *bd, char *commandline);
> static void setup_initrd_tag (bd_t *bd, ulong initrd_start,
> ulong initrd_end);
> static void setup_end_tag (bd_t *bd);
> static struct tag *params;
> static ulong get_sp(void);
> static int bootm_linux_fdt(int machid, bootm_headers_t *images);
>
> These function i need to build the atags. But they are defined static
> and not really meant to be used from the outside. What comes to my
> mind here is to create a new setup_atags.c in the same directory + a
> header in include. Is this the right place for this? Maybe another
> solution?
Look at bootm subcommands to run just the portion of the existing bootm
functionality that you need. Type "help bootm" for details.
-Scott
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list