[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v1 6/9] scaled down version of generic libraries for SPL

Aneesh V aneesh at ti.com
Fri Jul 15 14:41:39 CEST 2011


Hi Simon,

On Friday 15 July 2011 06:01 PM, Simon Schwarz wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> at the moment I'am playing a bit with your patch.
>
> I stumbled over this:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/Makefile b/arch/arm/lib/Makefile
>> index d31321a..300c8fa 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/lib/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/Makefile
>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ include $(TOPDIR)/config.mk
>>   LIB    = $(obj)lib$(ARCH).o
>>   LIBGCC = $(obj)libgcc.o
>>
>> +ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
>>   GLSOBJS        += _ashldi3.o
>>   GLSOBJS        += _ashrdi3.o
>>   GLSOBJS        += _divsi3.o
>> @@ -45,6 +46,7 @@ COBJS-y       += interrupts.o
>>   COBJS-y        += reset.o
>>   SOBJS-$(CONFIG_USE_ARCH_MEMSET) += memset.o
>>   SOBJS-$(CONFIG_USE_ARCH_MEMCPY) += memcpy.o
>> +endif
>
> Is it really your intention here to exclude board.c from the SPL? Or
> do i misinterpret something? Also cache.c I would include to a
> standard SPL.

Yes, it's intentional. At the moment OMAP spl doesn't need anything
from this directory other than the eabi_comapt.o. In the future if
somebody needs contents from another file for SPL they may have to
bring it out of the '#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD' block.

In all likelihood board.c will always remain out of SPL because board.c
defines board_init_f() and board_init_r() that are re-defined for SPL.
In the event some SPL has to reuse some content from this file, we may
have to make these functions weakly linked in this file. But I don't
think that will be ever needed.

best regards,
Aneesh


More information about the U-Boot mailing list