[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/6] Drop obsolete at91rm9200 support

[Reinhard Meyer]

Dear Wolfgang,

On 18.07.2011 21:41, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> The series "ARM: remove broken boards" deletes the last few boards which used
> the obsolete arm920t/at91rm9200 arch code.
> This series completes it and removes the now obsolete at91rm9200 arch code
> completely. Additionally ther are some more cleanup in documentation and
> surrounding code.
>
> This series applies on top of the "ARM: remove broken boards".
>
> Andreas Bießmann (6):
>    ARM: remove obsolete at91rm9200
>    MAKEALL: remove obsolete at91rm9200 soc
>    a/a/c/arm920t/cpu.c: remove CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY warning
>    README.at91-soc: remove AT91(RM9200) joining notice
>    net/eth.c: drop obsolete at91rm9200 support
>    README: fix arm920t/at91 path
>
>   MAKEALL                                           |    1 -
>   README                                            |    2 +-
>   arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/Makefile          |   56 --
>   arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/bcm5221.c         |  232 ------
>   arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/dm9161.c          |  225 ------
>   arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ether.c           |  316 --------
>   arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/i2c.c             |  192 -----
>   arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ks8721.c          |  249 -------
>   arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/lowlevel_init.S   |  169 -----
>   arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/lxt972.c          |  192 -----
>   arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/reset.c           |   71 --
>   arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/spi.c             |  151 ----
>   arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/timer.c           |  160 ----
>   arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/usb.c             |   53 --
>   arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/cpu.c                        |    4 -
>   arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91rm9200/AT91RM9200.h |  812 ---------------------
>   arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91rm9200/hardware.h   |   75 --
>   doc/README.at91-soc                               |   22 -
>   net/eth.c                                         |    4 -
>   19 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2985 deletions(-)
>   delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/Makefile
>   delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/bcm5221.c
>   delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/dm9161.c
>   delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ether.c
>   delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/i2c.c
>   delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ks8721.c
>   delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/lowlevel_init.S
>   delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/lxt972.c
>   delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/reset.c
>   delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/spi.c
>   delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/timer.c
>   delete mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/usb.c
>   delete mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91rm9200/AT91RM9200.h
>   delete mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91rm9200/hardware.h
>

I think it would be good to apply those patches removing the old,
superseded at91rm9200 files to master instead of next.

Would that be ok?

Best Regards,
Reinhard