[U-Boot] RFC [PATCH 2/5] arm/kirkwood: print speeds with cpu info.
Jason
u-boot at lakedaemon.net
Thu Jul 28 03:31:57 CEST 2011
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:21:16AM -0700, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jason Cooper [mailto:u-boot at lakedaemon.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 2:49 AM
> > To: clint at debian.org; wd at denx.de; Prafulla Wadaskar
> > Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; Prabhanjan Sarnaik; Ashish Karkare; Siddarth
> > Gore; bdale at gag.com; Jason Cooper
> > Subject: RFC [PATCH 2/5] arm/kirkwood: print speeds with cpu info.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <u-boot at lakedaemon.net>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/cpu.c | 46
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-kirkwood/cpu.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/cpu.c
> > b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/cpu.c
> > index b4a4c04..a69f9f2 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/cpu.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/cpu.c
> > @@ -270,11 +270,26 @@ static void kw_sysrst_check(void)
> > }
> >
> > #if defined(CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO)
> > +#define MSAR_CPUCLCK_EXTRACT(X) (((X & 0x2) >> 1) | ((X & 0x400000) >>
> > 21) | \
> > + ((X & 0x18) >> 1))
> > +#define MSAR_L2CLCK_EXTRACT(X) (((X & 0x600) >> 9) | ((X & 0x80000) >>
> > 17))
> > +#define MSAR_DDRCLCK_RTIO_MASK (0xf << 5)
> > +
> > +#define MSAR_TCLCK_OFFS 21
> > +#define MSAR_TCLCK_MASK (0x1 << MSAR_TCLCK_OFFS)
> > +#define MV_BOARD_TCLK_166MHZ 166666667
> > +#define MV_BOARD_TCLK_200MHZ 200000000
> > +#define MSAR_TCLCK_167 (0x1 << MSAR_TCLCK_OFFS)
> > +#define MSAR_TCLCK_200 (0x0 << MSAR_TCLCK_OFFS)
>
> There are one time used macros, can they be optimized?
Sure, do you prefer a static assignment:
#define MSAR_TCLCK_166 0x00200000
or, just do away with it altogether and use the number?
> > +
> > int print_cpuinfo(void)
> > {
> > char *rev;
> > u16 devid = (readl(KW_REG_PCIE_DEVID) >> 16) & 0xffff;
> > u8 revid = readl(KW_REG_PCIE_REVID) & 0xff;
> > + u32 cpu_clk, t_clk, tmp;
> > + u32 sys_clk, l2_clk;
> > + u32 l2_ratio, ddr_ratio;
> >
> > if ((readl(KW_REG_DEVICE_ID) & 0x03) > 2) {
> > printf("Error.. %s:Unsupported Kirkwood SoC 88F%04x\n",
> > __FUNCTION__, devid);
> > @@ -297,6 +312,37 @@ int print_cpuinfo(void)
> > }
> >
> > printf("SoC: Kirkwood 88F%04x_%s\n", devid, rev);
> > +
> > + tmp = readl(MPP_SAMPLE_AT_RESET);
> > + cpu_clk = MSAR_CPUCLCK_EXTRACT(tmp);
> > + if (cpu_clk == 0x9)
> > + cpu_clk = 1200;
> > +
> > + l2_ratio = MSAR_L2CLCK_EXTRACT(tmp);
> > + l2_clk = cpu_clk / l2_ratio;
> > +
> > + ddr_ratio = tmp & MSAR_DDRCLCK_RTIO_MASK;
> > + ddr_ratio = ddr_ratio >> 5;
> > + if (ddr_ratio == 4)
> > + sys_clk = 400;
> > +
> > + switch (tmp & MSAR_TCLCK_MASK) {
> > + case MSAR_TCLCK_167:
> > + t_clk = MV_BOARD_TCLK_166MHZ;
> > + break;
> > + case MSAR_TCLCK_200:
> > + t_clk = MV_BOARD_TCLK_200MHZ;
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + t_clk = MV_BOARD_TCLK_200MHZ;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + printf("CPU running @ %dMHz L2 running @ %dMHz\n",
> > + cpu_clk, l2_clk);
> > + printf("SysClock = %dMHz, TClock = %dMHz\n",
> > + sys_clk, t_clk / 1000000);
>
> It is good to encapsulate this in #ifdef CONFIG_SYS_XXX
It's already encapsulated in CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO, so if enabled, on
boot it looks like:
SoC: Kirkwood 88F6281_A1
CPU running @ 1200MHz L2 running @ 400MHz
SysClock = 400MHz, TClock = 200MHz
I can encapsulate it separately if you want, but it seems a little too
fine grained for me. Either I want cpu info, or I don't. ymmv.
thx,
Jason.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list