[U-Boot] RFC [PATCH 5/5 v5] dreamplug: use MACH_TYPE_DREAMPLUG

[Prafulla Wadaskar]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason [mailto:u-boot at lakedaemon.net]
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 7:38 AM
> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> Cc: clint at debian.org; wd at denx.de; u-boot at lists.denx.de; Prabhanjan
> Sarnaik; Ashish Karkare; Siddarth Gore; bdale at gag.com
> Subject: Re: RFC [PATCH 5/5 v5] dreamplug: use MACH_TYPE_DREAMPLUG
> 
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:40:27AM -0700, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jason Cooper [mailto:u-boot at lakedaemon.net]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 2:49 AM
> > > To: clint at debian.org; wd at denx.de; Prafulla Wadaskar
> > > Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; Prabhanjan Sarnaik; Ashish Karkare;
> Siddarth
> > > Gore; bdale at gag.com; Jason Cooper
> > > Subject: RFC [PATCH 5/5 v5] dreamplug: use MACH_TYPE_DREAMPLUG
> >
> > Sorry about my related comments in patch 4/5, you can merge this patch
> > to 4/5 to avoid confusion.
> 
> See my comments in my reply to 4/5.  I'd like (if possible) to get this
> merged before h*ll freezes over (Linux arm tree cleaned up).  So, I'm
> trying to break the patch up into logical migration pieces.
> 
> Since every Dreamplug on the market sets and uses MACH_TYPE_GURUPLUG, I
> think it's reasonable to use it (hopefully merged into u-boot) until the
> linux-arm tree gets sorted out and they accept new boards / machids.
> Then, the last patch can be added.
> 
> Am I way off base with that idea?

So this is gating to provide dreamplug as separate board support or anther version for guruplug.

Regards..
Prafulla . .