[U-Boot] Question re: Bluewater Systems Snapper 9260 and 9G20 modules patch
Reinhard Meyer
u-boot at emk-elektronik.de
Sun Jun 5 14:57:48 CEST 2011
Dear Simon Glass,
> Hi Reinhard,
>
> I have been asked to have a quick look at this patch, which is showing accepted here:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/81422/
>
> The diffstat on patchwork is:
>
> MAINTAINERS | 5 +
> board/bluewater/snapper9260/Makefile | 53 ++++++++
> board/bluewater/snapper9260/snapper9260.c | 169 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> boards.cfg | 2 +
> include/configs/snapper9260.h | 191 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 420 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 board/bluewater/snapper9260/Makefile
> create mode 100644 board/bluewater/snapper9260/snapper9260.c
> create mode 100644 include/configs/snapper9260.h
>
> but when I look at the commit I only see this:
>
> git log --author=Ryan --stat
> commit 74cd9777f8dd44fd944a9ac75cfbc24eeb206453
> Author: Ryan Mallon <ryan at bluewatersys.com <mailto:ryan at bluewatersys.com>>
> Date: Tue Feb 1 16:18:00 2011 +0000
>
> Add support for Bluewater Systems Snapper 9260 and 9G20 modules
>
> Add support for Bluewater Systems AT91 based Snapper 9260 and 9G20
> single board computer modules. Includes NAND flash and Ethernet
> support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Mallon <ryan at bluewatersys.com <mailto:ryan at bluewatersys.com>>
>
> boards.cfg | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>
> As a result it does not build. Has something been dropped by mistake?
I had accepted that patch after manually fixing the style problems. I do not know why the
fixed files got lost. The accepted patch was V3. Since then a V4 patch had been posted to
which Albert had commented and I therefore put it on "changes requested".
I would think its now the best way to get a redone V5 patch (based on current TOT)
for those boards ASAP.
Sorry for the mixup.
Best Regards,
Reinhard
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list