[U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91 rework: pm9261, pm9263 and pm9g45

[Reinhard Meyer]

Dear Asen Dimov,
> Hi Reinhard,
> 
> On 06/09/2011 02:00 PM, Reinhard Meyer wrote:
> ...
>>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99665/
>>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99666/
>>>>
>>>> [PM9263]
>>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99662/
>>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99668/
>>>>
>>>> [PM9G45]
>>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99664/
>>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99667/
>> Ah, and patches should be numbered 1/n .. n/n; 0/n is only
>> for a descriptive summary.
>>
> should I repost them numbering with 1/n?
After applying, the text within [] is gone anyway,
so it is ok for me.

Unless someone mandates otherwise...

Best Regards,
Reinhard