[U-Boot] [PATCH V3 2/5] mv_i2c: use structure to replace the direclty define
Lei Wen
adrian.wenl at gmail.com
Wed Mar 23 09:48:49 CET 2011
Hi Wolfgang,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk <wd at denx.de> wrote:
> Dear Lei Wen,
>
> In message <AANLkTikMYpVVJDRnGRVZ3XZsYTn_yprpfMUUp_3DdHbJ at mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>>
> ...
>> >> - writel(readl(ICR) & ~ICR_ACKNA> K, ICR);
>> >> - writel(readl(ICR) & ~ICR_ALDIE, ICR);
>> >> - writel(readl(ICR) | ICR_TB, ICR);
>> >> + PXAI2C_AND(&base->icr, ~ICR_AC> KNAK);
>> >> + PXAI2C_AND(&base->icr, ~ICR_ALDIE);
>> >> + PXAI2C_OR(&base->icr, ICR_TB);
>> >
>> > What are benefits of those macros?
>> > To me this looks ugly and looses readability.
>>
>> This intend for short the original too long code, but I don't reject to ret> urn
>> to the readl, write one.
>
> Please either use plain writel() / readl() accessors, or,
> alternatively, implement standard accessors that could be used by
> everybody else for the same purpose, too.
>
> See for example the misc clrbits*(), setbits*() or clrsetbits*()
> macros as dfined for example in "arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h"
Yep, that is what I want. :)
I would post next patch set include this suggestion.
Thanks,
Lei
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list