[U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details
Wolfgang Denk
wd at denx.de
Fri May 27 09:17:10 CEST 2011
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message <BANLkTi=Nj09smJ+tTuE4p=rWFz=r9GBhwQ at mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> I think we should - If CONFIG_SYS_HZ _MUST_ be 1000 anyway, what is the
> point. Also, get_timer() utilisation as it stands for the most part already
> assumes a 1ms time base. Maybe we should change get_timer() to
> get_ms_timer() to avoid any ambiguity
No. At least not unless you also provide other get_<some unit>_timer()
functions which we most likely will not do.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
If the odds are a million to one against something occuring, chances
are 50-50 it will.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list