[U-Boot] arm mach-types.h
Michael Walle
michael at walle.cc
Sun Nov 13 00:58:42 CET 2011
Hi,
Does u-boot always follow the mach-types.h from upstream linux? Is there any
policy?
If thats true, it means, that
- every supported board in u-boot has to be supported in mainline linux,
too. because that is the basic requirement for an entry to stay in this
file.
- a device with device tree bindings, won't have any mach-type entry at all,
which means, that a distribution is not able to backport a device support
from DT form to an old-fashioned setup code (eg. support for a board on
older linux kernels, which doesn't have ARM device tree support).
IMHO u-boot should have its own mach-types.h (maybe autogenerated, like the
linux kernel do), just with entries for boards which are supported by u-boot.
This way, there won't be any problems with new board support patches.
Opinions?
--
Michael
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list