[U-Boot] [PATCH] [x86] Fix some bugs in the i8402 driver when no controller is present

[Gabe Black]

On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Graeme Russ <graeme.russ at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Gabe,
>
> On 08/11/11 20:48, Gabe Black wrote:
> > If no controller is present, the i8402 driver should return immediately
> and
> > not attempt to operate on the missing hardware.
> >
> > In kbd_input_empty, the status register is checked every millisecond to
> see
> > whether the input buffer is empty, up to a timeout which is tracked by
> > decrimenting a counter each time the check is performed. The decrement is
> > performed with a postfix -- operator, and the value of the counter is
> > checked in place. That means that when the counter reaches zero and the
> > loop terminates, it will actually be decrimented one more time and become
> > -1. That value is returned as the return value of the function. That
> would
> > give the right answer if it wasn't for that extra decrement because a
> > timeout would indicate that the buffer never became empty.
> >
> > This change fixes both of those bugs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack at chromium.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/input/i8042.c |   12 +++++++++++-
> >  1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
>
> total: 1 errors, 5 warnings, 30 lines checked
>
> Patch is not checkpatch clean - Can you please fix checkpatch issues and
> change tag to 'x86:' style and resubmit
>
> Thanks,
>
> Graeme
>
>
checkpatch doesn't like it because I was consistent with the existing
incorrect style in the file. There are three or four options for how to
handle this.

1. Match the current style and ignore checkpatch (what I've already done).
2. Fix the style on just the lines I've modified.
3. Fix the style within a "local" area around my changes, for some
definition of local, along with my changes.
4. Submit a separate cleanup patch which fixes the style first.

What is the standard way of approaching this sort of situation? I'm ok with
option 1 if you are since I already have that ready to go, and I'd be fine
with 4 if you'd like to clean up this file first like you've been cleaning
up some others. 2 and 3 would make the style in that file inconsistent and
harder to read, but if that's standard practice I'll do that.

Gabe