[U-Boot] [PATCH] omap: spl: fix build break due to changes in FAT

[Scott Wood]

On 10/04/2011 10:38 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> I think it is a bad idea to go this way.
> 
> We should face the fact that SPL code is running before proper
> relocation to RAM, and thus there are certain limitations.
> 
> Certain parts of the code, including file system code, has not been
> written with such limitations in mind.  It makes use of functions that
> are not available in SPL code, or of features that are not available
> in SPL code (like a heap, or a virtually unlimited stack).
> 
> You may be lucky here, and your test cases with the FFAT code may
> actually work.  But I would not bet on it.
> 
> 
> U-Boot has not been designed to run complex code like file systemes
> before relocation, and SPL code _is_ before relocation.

SPL has its own relocation.  If it were under the same restrictions as
normal pre-relocation U-Boot, where would it load an image to?

All SPL really is, is some makefile infrastructure to produce a second,
special-purpose U-Boot image.  The degree to which it is stripped down
depends on the requirements of the particular target.

-Scott