[U-Boot] [PATCH] AVR32: fix timer_init() function

[Andreas Bießmann]

Dear Sven,

two things:
 a) please read http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/U-Boot/Patches#Sending_updated_patch_versions
 b) my first hint wasn't that good ...

Am 04.10.2011 um 16:37 schrieb Sven Schnelle:

> Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel at googlemail.com> writes:
> 
>>> -	if (set_interrupt_handler(0, &timer_interrupt_handler, 3))
>>> -		return;
>>> +	if ((ret = set_interrupt_handler(0, &timer_interrupt_handler, 3)))
>>> +		return ret;
>> can you do it like this:
>> 
>> ret = set_interrupt_handler();
>> if (ret)
>> 	return ret;
> 
> Sure, modified patch attached. Thanks!
> 
> -- 
> AVR32: fix timer_init() function
> 
> timer_init() now returns an int (the error code) instead of void.
> This makes compilation fail with:
> 
> interrupts.c:111: error: conflicting types for 'timer_init'
> /home/svens/u-boot/u-boot/include/common.h:246: error: previous declaration of 'timer_init' was here
> make[1]: *** [interrupts.o] Error 1
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens at stackframe.org>
> ---
> arch/avr32/cpu/interrupts.c |    9 ++++++---
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/avr32/cpu/interrupts.c b/arch/avr32/cpu/interrupts.c
> index 6681e13..97910b3 100644
> --- a/arch/avr32/cpu/interrupts.c
> +++ b/arch/avr32/cpu/interrupts.c
> @@ -107,10 +107,11 @@ static int set_interrupt_handler(unsigned int nr, void (*handler)(void),
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> -void timer_init(void)
> +int timer_init(void)
> {
> 	extern void timer_interrupt_handler(void);
> 	u64 tmp;
> +	int ret;
> 
> 	sysreg_write(COUNT, 0);
> 
> @@ -119,9 +120,11 @@ void timer_init(void)
> 	do_div(tmp, gd->cpu_hz);
> 	tb_factor = (u32)tmp;
> 
> -	if (set_interrupt_handler(0, &timer_interrupt_handler, 3))
> -		return;
> +	ret = set_interrupt_handler(0, &timer_interrupt_handler, 3);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

Since set_interrupt_handler() does not return any useful information on error I think it is enough to return -EINVAL as set_interrupt_handler() does. If we do it that way we can omit the 'int ret' value completely.

best regards

Andreas Bießmann