[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] SPL: Allow user to disable CPU support library
Marek Vasut
marek.vasut at gmail.com
Fri Oct 7 01:35:30 CEST 2011
On Thursday, October 06, 2011 05:54:17 PM Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/05/2011 07:13 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Introduce CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE to avoid compiling the CPU
> > support library. This can be useful on some setups.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at gmail.com>
> > Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic at denx.de>
> > Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd at denx.de>
> > Cc: Detlev Zundel <dzu at denx.de>
> > Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com>
> > ---
> >
> > spl/Makefile | 5 +++++
> > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/spl/Makefile b/spl/Makefile
> > index 91dd11a..fc9360f 100644
> > --- a/spl/Makefile
> > +++ b/spl/Makefile
> > @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@
> >
> > CONFIG_SPL_BUILD := y
> > export CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> >
> > +# In case we want to avoid the CPU support code, we need to define this:
> > +ifdef CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE
> > +export CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE
> > +endif
>
> Why do we need this here, but not for other config symbols that
> subordinate makefiles use (e.g. in the normal, non-SPL case)?
>
> Shouldn't the cpu makefile include config.mk, which includes
> autoconf.mk, which defines this symbol?
>
> -Scott
Right, you can ignore this patch and apply only 2/2.
Cheers
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list