[U-Boot] Checkpatch warnings for "volatile"

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Prabhakar Lad,

In message <CA+V-a8sYRZJDZojEpQ55ZGRZ6--Niq0ThKVV8e_RtQrRuShE8A at mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
> 
> > I've explained this a number of times recently - there are actually
> > very, very few occasions where "volatile" actually makes sense.
> >
> >      Agreed, but I see a piece of code where virtual address are compared.
>      For example in arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/cpu.c
>      In this function static inline unsigned pll_prediv(unsigned pllbase)
> and
>      also in this static inline unsigned pll_postdiv(unsigned pllbase)
> 
>      Any suggestion on this on how to tackle or let it remain stagnant?

I cannot see a justification for any of the ""volatile" in this file.

Of course, all these ugly REG() calls should be converted to proper
use of I/O accessors.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Hindsight is an exact science.