[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] Introduce generic TPM support in u-boot

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Vadim Bendebury,

In message <CANy1buJ0mhpDY948c+PM6u4EsWtoHw3+-u+m_FNiG3BztBinVA at mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
> 
> because this chip is sensitive to the access cycle size (byte versus word).
> 
> When using macros one can rely on the passed in pointer type to decide
> which access to use (byte vs word). If using inline functions, there
> would be two separate functions required for read (byte and u32) and
> write (byte and u32).

This would then be an improvement in the code, as we then can see
what the code is actually doing.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
What the gods would destroy they first submit to  an  IEEE  standards
committee.