[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] SPL: Allow ARM926EJS to avoid compiling in the CPU support code

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Hi Marek,

Le 06/10/2011 02:13, Marek Vasut a écrit :
> This allows the SPL to avoid compiling in the CPU support code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut<marek.vasut at gmail.com>
> Cc: Stefano Babic<sbabic at denx.de>
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk<wd at denx.de>
> Cc: Detlev Zundel<dzu at denx.de>
> Cc: Scott Wood<scottwood at freescale.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/Makefile |    7 +++++++
>   1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/Makefile b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/Makefile
> index 930e0d1..3f9b0f1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/Makefile
> @@ -28,6 +28,13 @@ LIB	= $(obj)lib$(CPU).o
>   START	= start.o
>   COBJS	= cpu.o
>
> +ifdef	CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> +ifdef	CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE
> +START	:=
> +COBJS	:=
> +endif
> +endif
> +
>   SRCS	:= $(START:.o=.S) $(SOBJS:.o=.S) $(COBJS:.o=.c)
>   OBJS	:= $(addprefix $(obj),$(COBJS) $(SOBJS))
>   START	:= $(addprefix $(obj),$(START))

cpu.c basically contains one cache management function and one 
linux-boot-related function probably better suited in bootm... Rather 
than adding a config option to avoid compiling cpu.c, should we not 
simply move the functions where they belong?

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.