[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] Add limits.h to hold basic limits
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Fri Oct 21 23:12:19 CEST 2011
Hi Albert,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
<albert.u.boot at aribaud.net> wrote:
> Le 21/10/2011 22:19, Simon Glass a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Albert,
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
>> <albert.u.boot at aribaud.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> Le 10/10/2011 21:22, Simon Glass a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> This brings a basic limits.h implementation into U-Boot.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass<sjg at chromium.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> fs/ubifs/ubifs.h | 4 +---
>>>> include/limits.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>> create mode 100644 include/limits.h
>>>
>>> Apparently, in all the U-Boot codebase, only one file required standard
>>> limit names, and gets them with three lines of code. Is it worth adding
>>> 40
>>> lines of code for this?
>>
>> Well 2/3 is the license header - and I thought it best to add all the
>> limits in one go. I can add just those few if you like.
>>
>> This file is used later in the patch series.
>
> I don't see much use of these in the subsequent patches either -- and those
> few uses could be discussed, such as for instance the use of INT_MAX as the
> maximum buffer size for some *printf() functions -- actually, anything very
> big would fit just as well, would it not?
Yes it would, it's doesn't really need to be INT_MAX. Then again,
limits.h is a fairly standard file to have around, and INT_MAX is an
efficient 'large' value to load on many architectures.
In any case it seems wrong to me that ubifs is defining its own
INT_MAX and U-Boot doesn't have one.
Regards,
Simon
>
>> Regards,
>> Simon
>
> Amicalement,
> --
> Albert.
>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list