[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/8] Add setenv_uint() and setenv_addr()

[Mike Frysinger]

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 18:41, Simon Glass wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 18:01, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Simon Glass wrote:
>>>> isn't it intended that env variables without a leading 0x in the value
>>>> be interpreted as hex still? Iwc do I really want the 0x?
>>>
>>> Yes, this is intended.  No, we do NOT want to see the 0x in such
>>> cases.
>>
>> ok, so we'll want to stick with %x like you already have Simon.  i
>> disagree, but not enough to fight over it ;).
>
> OK. But I can use %p if you don't send your patch. How about %#p to
> display 0x? It would be incompatible with glibc, but seems more
> sensible. Then we could use this in quite a few places in U-Boot I
> suspect.

i think wolfgang's point is that he doesn't want "0x" in env vars.  i
don't think he made any statement about %p in general.

also, %#p works the same under u-boot as under glibc.  it's just that
%#p generates a gcc warning.
-mike