[U-Boot] [PATCH 05/10 v3] spl, nand: add 4bit HW ecc oob first nand_read_page function

Heiko Schocher hs at denx.de
Fri Oct 28 08:05:59 CEST 2011


Hello Scott,

Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/27/2011 12:23 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>>> In drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c CONFIG_SYS_NAND_4BIT_HW_ECC_OOBFIRST
>>>> is used, and there are 4bit specific functions, so this define is
>>>> also valid, just we need in drivers/mtd/nand/nand_spl_simple.c a more
>>>> common name, right?
>>> Right.  Ideally, though, that would either be CONFIG_SYS_DAVINCI_... or
>>> #if defined(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_HW_ECC_OOBFIRST) && \
>>>     defined(CONFIG_SYS_NAND_HW_ECC_4BIT)
>> Hmm.. I thought you meant, this is not davinci nor 4bit specific?
>> Or do you mean to rename the CONFIG_SYS_NAND_4BIT_HW_ECC_OOBFIRST
>> define in drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c?
> 
> I just mean that "4bit" and "oobfirst" are independent things, so I'd
> rather not have something that combines the two as part of the
> configuration of the general NAND interface in the absence of a
> requirement to enumerate all possibilities.  OTOH, the structure of
> driver's private config can be whatever makes the most sense for that
> driver, but should be named in a way that it's obviously driver-specific.

So my v4 version of this patch is ok? see:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/121295/

Maybe we should rename the CONFIG_SYS_NAND_4BIT_HW_ECC_OOBFIRST
in drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c to CONFIG_SYS_DAVINCI_NAND_HW_4BIT
in a seperate patch?

Sandeep?

bye,
Heiko
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany


More information about the U-Boot mailing list