[U-Boot] [PATCH] cmd_bdinfo: simplify local static funcs a bit
Mike Frysinger
vapier at gentoo.org
Mon Oct 31 22:38:32 CET 2011
On Monday 31 October 2011 16:47:08 Simon Glass wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 31 October 2011 15:11:35 Simon Glass wrote:
> >> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> > If we move the local funcs to the top of the file, and use the
> >> > __maybe_unused define, we can drop a lot of ugly ifdef logic and
> >> > duplicated prototypes.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org>
> >>
> >> This is much cleaner - is the correct style to put attribute tags on
> >> the previous line?
> >
> > when responding to add your own, there isn't any real protocol. just
> > normal e-mail etiquette (no top posting/etc...). patchwork/humans will
> > do the right thing when manually updating the changelog.
>
> Actually I meant the __maybe_unused tag before the function name.
ah. i'm not sure there is a hard rule here. i did that because one line
would make the func def too long to fit.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20111031/0b6ba257/attachment.pgp
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list