[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/12] x86: Allow compiling out realmode/bios code
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Fri Nov 30 03:25:27 CET 2012
Hi Graham,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Graeme Russ <graeme.russ at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>> Hi Graeme,
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Graeme Russ <graeme.russ at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> Hmm, what to do about boot_zimage() in arch/x86/lib/zimage.c. If you
>>> define CONFIG_X86_NO_REAL_MODE but don't define CONFIG_ZBOOT_32 you
>>> will get a linker failure. Maybe change:
>>>
>>> #if defined CONFIG_ZBOOT_32 to
>>>
>>> #if (defined CONFIG_ZBOOT_32 or defined CONFIG_X86_NO_REAL_MODE)
>>
>> Funny I just had that and took it out. My thought was that it would be
>> a strange board that didn't define both. I will add that code back in.
>
> Not strange - completely broken. Maybe add a #error if
> CONFIG_X86_NO_REAL_MODE is defined and CONFIG_ZBOOT_32 is not?
OK, I might need to put that in a new patch. Or do you think it is ok
to stick it in here? I just sent a new version.
>
> It is perfectly legitimate to define CONFIG_ZBOOT_32 while not
> defining CONFIG_X86_NO_REAL_MODE
OK.
Regards,
Simon
>
> Regards,
>
> Graeme
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list