[U-Boot] bootstopkey reason behind it
Wolfgang Denk
wd at denx.de
Sun Aug 4 22:21:48 CEST 2013
Dear Paavaanan_T_N at Dell.com,
In message <D5A6F3355F664C40AFB65BB1277D8D450193B22639 at MAAX7MCDC101.APAC.DELL.COM> you wrote:
>
> To stop autoboot we have 2 ifdef (CONFIG_AUTOBOOT_STOP_ [STR2 ||
> STR1] ). Which is very easy and straightforward to implement. Halting
> a boot with single "Keystroke" is having its own advantages to the
> user. But, why multiple key support is ignored say like [ctrl +
> anykey ] combination. Especially, BIOS vendors prefer at least
> simultaneous pressing of 2 or more keys to halt the boot. Any
> specific reasons to avoid this. Other than simplicity is there any
> specific reason to stick on this.
BIOSes and BIOS compatible extension cards (say, PCI controllers) are
usually a major PITA when you are not working in an environment where
you have a real keyboard attached. We're dealing with embedded
devices here, and often we have only communication paths like a serial
port (eventually even over a modem line), or netconsole.
Have you ever tried to transmit some "ALT + some_key" control
sequences over a serial port?
> I mean why simultaneous two key press support is avoided and
> implemented a secondary bootstopkey to halt the boot say like
> CONFIG_AUTOBOOT_STOP_STR2.
This is done because usually we do not have a real keyboard. So
anything that cannot be mapped into the standard ASCII character set
cannot be used here.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Any fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It
takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage - to move in the
opposite direction. - Albert Einstein
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list