[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/7] The patchset fixes some issue in the generation of the imx image
Tom Rini
trini at ti.com
Mon Aug 19 18:19:33 CEST 2013
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:39:27PM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote:
> (header for Freescale's i.MX processors) to allow the usage of
> Freescale's tools to sign the u-boot image and provide a secure boot.
>
> This has nothing to do with the Secure Boot extensions implemented by
> Simon Glass, that can be in any case used to boot later a secure image.
> Freescale's secure boot ensures that a signed bootloader
> is started only if it is verified with a key that is burned into the iMX fuses.
> Documentation about the Freescale's secure process can be read from the
> AN4591, available on the Freescale's Website.
Where does Marek's patch fall in here exactly? Should he be based on
top of yours, yours on his? It should all go via u-boot-imx, so you'll
have to do the merging anyhow :) And on that note, things seem as sane
as they're likley going to be, with the caveat of what you've already
said you'll v3.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20130819/7e3e599b/attachment.pgp>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list