[U-Boot] [PATCH V2] ARM: Fix malloc area size for versatile and integrator

[Marek Vasut]

Dear Albert ARIBAUD,

> Hi Marek,
> 
> On Sat,  3 Nov 2012 10:11:27 +0100, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
> > These boards couldn't save their environment because they couldn't
> > malloc() the whole size of the sector.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
> > ---
> > 
> >  include/configs/integrator-common.h |    3 ++-
> >  include/configs/versatile.h         |    2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > V2: Align with current code
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/configs/integrator-common.h
> > b/include/configs/integrator-common.h index 564b418..51227e7 100644
> > --- a/include/configs/integrator-common.h
> > +++ b/include/configs/integrator-common.h
> > @@ -37,7 +37,8 @@
> > 
> >  #define
> >  CONFIG_SYS_PBSIZE		(CONFIG_SYS_CBSIZE+sizeof(CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT)+16)
> >  #define CONFIG_SYS_MAXARGS		16	/* max number of command args */ 
#define
> >  CONFIG_SYS_BARGSIZE		CONFIG_SYS_CBSIZE /* Boot Argument 
Buffer Size*/
> > 
> > -#define CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_LEN		(CONFIG_ENV_SIZE + 128*1024) /* 
Size of
> > malloc() pool */ +/* Size of malloc() pool */
> > +#define CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_LEN		(CONFIG_ENV_SECT_SIZE + 
128*1024)
> > 
> >  #define CONFIG_CMDLINE_TAG		/* enable passing of ATAGs  */
> >  #define CONFIG_SETUP_MEMORY_TAGS
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/configs/versatile.h b/include/configs/versatile.h
> > index a65c676..2484881 100644
> > --- a/include/configs/versatile.h
> > +++ b/include/configs/versatile.h
> > @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
> > 
> >   * Size of malloc() pool
> >   */
> >  
> >  #define CONFIG_ENV_SIZE			8192
> > 
> > -#define CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_LEN		(CONFIG_ENV_SIZE + 128 * 1024)
> > +#define CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_LEN		(CONFIG_ENV_SECT_SIZE + 128 * 
1024)
> > 
> >  /*
> >  
> >   * Hardware drivers
> 
> This does not build properly on current ARM ToT:
> 
> board.c:395:19: error: 'CONFIG_ENV_SECT_SIZE' undeclared (first use in
> this function)
> 
> All 4 of integratorap_cm720t integratorap_cm920t integratorap_cm926ejs
> integratorap_cm946es fail.

Yea well, the original patch is like one year old now ... I guess these things 
happen.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut