[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] Add bmp_layout module for accessing BMP header data

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Igor,

In message <5110EF4F.3080308 at compulab.co.il> you wrote:
>
> > Why should we?  Who tells that this is not perfectly legal on the
> > running system?
> 
> It might be perfectly legal, but we also consider a tons of work
> explaining why and how this should be done (needless to mention the
> amount of bricked boards).

Please understand that I will not really buy this "bricked bord"
argument.  This is an issue where system builders and users are
involved.  Apparently the system builders agree that performance
is so important that they compile with optimizer options that do
not tolerate unaligned accesses, thus introducing the problem.
This is OK for systems where only educated users have access.  If you
open the U-Boot console interface to uneducated users, you are always
running some risk that a stupid command will brick the board or at
least make it no longer usable to that user.  And as a user you should
well be aware that bad things can happen, and that it is an excellent
idea to actually test any new settings or operations before installing
these.  If users ignore even such basic rules, then the situation is
f*cked up and cannot be helped - if it's not the spalsh screen, then
these users will find other ways to run into trouble.

> > Let me repeat it: U-Boot is a boot loader.  It is not intended for
> > meddling by avarage Johnny Loser, but for system programmers who know
> > what they are doing. And anyone doing such things is well adviced to
> > _test_ his settings on the command line before storing these for
> > automatic use.  As I mentioned before, omitting such tests is a sin
> > that carries with it its own punishment.
> 
> What are you trying to say?
> Is it that the environment variables change and in particular
> the splash screen installation _must_ be done by a programmer?

I tried to be clear: people who work on such a level are supposed to
know what they are doing.


I find it interesting that a lot of arguments get raised here how
important this issue is (is it? who has actually bricked a system
this way?), and how that is a special case (here I disagree), but
so far you all appear to ignore my argument of testing settings
before putting these to use.

I see little excuse for neglecting such really basic diligence.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
How many seconds are there in a year? If I tell you there are 3.155 x
10^7, you won't even try to remember it. On the other hand, who could
forget that, to within half a percent, pi seconds is a nanocentury.
                                                - Tom Duff, Bell Labs