[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] SPL: ONENAND: Support SPL to boot u-boot from OneNAND.

[Tom Rini]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/07/2013 05:43 AM, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:

[snip]
>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/spl.h:29:#define 
>> BOOT_DEVICE_ONE_NAND   3 
>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap5/spl.h:30:#define 
>> BOOT_DEVICE_ONE_NAND    4 
>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap4/spl.h:30:#define 
>> BOOT_DEVICE_ONE_NAND   4 
>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx35/spl.h:30:#define 
>> BOOT_DEVICE_ONE_NAND    4
>> 
>> For me, also looks better use ONENAND, but then, I need to
>> change all these defines. What do you prefer ? Maintain the use
>> of ONE_NAND or change these defines ?
>> 
> 
> Before sending version 2. Any comment on this ? I can use 
> BOOT_DEVICE_ONE_NAND or I should change for BOOT_DEVICE_ONENAND ?

The technology is ONENAND right?  Lets just fix the other defines.

- -- 
Tom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=s8l3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----