[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 12/23] Add spl load feature
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Tue Feb 12 21:29:44 CET 2013
On 02/08/2013 09:12:08 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> This adds secondary program loader support to the generic board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> ---
> Changes in v5: None
> Changes in v4: None
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2: None
>
> common/board_f.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/common/board_f.c b/common/board_f.c
> index aa10f4b..3a8036f 100644
> --- a/common/board_f.c
> +++ b/common/board_f.c
> @@ -309,6 +309,7 @@ static int reserve_uboot(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> /* reserve memory for malloc() area */
> static int reserve_malloc(void)
> {
> @@ -328,6 +329,7 @@ static int reserve_board(void)
> sizeof(bd_t), gd->dest_addr_sp);
> return 0;
> }
> +#endif
>
> static int setup_machine(void)
> {
> @@ -365,6 +367,7 @@ static int reserve_fdt(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> static int reserve_stacks(void)
> {
> /* setup stack pointer for exceptions */
> @@ -384,6 +387,17 @@ static int reserve_stacks(void)
>
> return 0;
> }
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> +static int reserve_stacks_spl(void)
> +{
> + /* Why not -= ? */
> + gd->dest_addr_sp += 128; /* leave 32 words for
> abort-stack */
> + gd->irq_sp = gd->dest_addr_sp;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
"abort-stack" doesn't sound very generic, and that "why not" question
should probably be answered.
> static int display_new_sp(void)
> {
> @@ -524,12 +538,18 @@ static init_fnc_t init_sequence_f[] = {
> reserve_lcd,
> #endif
> reserve_uboot,
> +#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> reserve_malloc,
> reserve_board,
> +#endif
> setup_machine,
> reserve_global_data,
> reserve_fdt,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> + reserve_stacks_spl,
> +#else
> reserve_stacks,
> +#endif
Why not just put the ifdef inside reserve_stacks()? Or at least give
them the same name?
-Scott
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list