[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-x86.git

Wed Feb 27 22:18:23 CET 2013

Hi Tom,

I have pulled the latest series into a branch in the x86 tree. You can
also get it from patchwork. If you are happy with it, please see
below. I haven't seen any comments for a few days.

The following changes since commit 47104c37de076e2be35ae1b3d144614f4d24a766:

  MAKEALL: add support for per architecture toolchains (2013-02-20
09:40:34 -0500)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.denx.de/u-boot-x86.git mem

for you to fetch changes up to dc63c7ccecee7b22fdc06f2c9d62d53bd5511b00:

  hash: Use lower case for hash algorithm names (2013-02-27 13:13:16 -0800)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Allen Martin (1):
      sandbox: fix compiler warning

Simon Glass (21):
      Tidy up error checking and fix bug in hash command
      Update print_buffer() to use const
      sandbox: Add un/map_sysmen() to deal with sandbox's ram_buf
      sandbox: Change memory commands to use map_physmem
      Split out the memory tests into separate functions
      Use common mtest iteration counting
      Fix mtest indenting
      Bring mtest putc() into common code
      Reduce casting in mtest
      Update set_working_fdt_addr() to use setenv_addr()
      common: Use new numeric setenv functions
      fs: Use new numeric setenv functions
      net: Use new numeric setenv functions
      image: Use crc header file instead of C prototypes
      hash: Add a flag to support saving hashes in the environment
      Roll crc32 into hash infrastructure
      sandbox: config: Enable hash functions and mtest
      Move CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_SCRATCH #ifdef to top of file
      sandbox: Update mtest to fix crashes
      sandbox: Allow hash functions to work correctly
      hash: Use lower case for hash algorithm names

Taylor Hutt (1):
      sandbox: Improve sandbox serial port keyboard interface

 README                        |   9 +
 arch/sandbox/config.mk        |   1 +
 arch/sandbox/cpu/os.c         |   8 +
 arch/sandbox/cpu/start.c      |   3 +
 arch/sandbox/include/asm/io.h |  10 +
 common/cmd_bootm.c            |  11 +-
 common/cmd_cbfs.c             |   4 +-
 common/cmd_cramfs.c           |   4 +-
 common/cmd_fdos.c             |   4 +-
 common/cmd_fdt.c              |  11 +-
 common/cmd_hash.c             |  14 +-
 common/cmd_jffs2.c            |   4 +-
 common/cmd_load.c             |  12 +-
 common/cmd_mem.c              | 798 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 common/cmd_mtdparts.c         |   4 +-
 common/cmd_nand.c             |  12 +-
 common/cmd_nvedit.c           |  11 +-
 common/cmd_reiser.c           |   4 +-
 common/cmd_setexpr.c          |  39 ++-
 common/cmd_sha1sum.c          |   6 +-
 common/cmd_unzip.c            |   4 +-
 common/cmd_ximg.c             |   7 +-
 common/cmd_zfs.c              |   3 +-
 common/cmd_zip.c              |   4 +-
 common/hash.c                 | 194 +++++++---
 common/image.c                |   4 +-
 drivers/net/fm/fm.c           |   4 +-
 drivers/serial/sandbox.c      |  44 ++-
 fs/fs.c                       |   4 +-
 fs/ubifs/ubifs.c              |   4 +-
 include/common.h              |  29 +-
 include/configs/sandbox.h     |   9 +-
 include/hash.h                |  13 +-
 include/os.h                  |  10 +
 include/u-boot/crc.h          |  11 +
 lib/crc32.c                   |   9 +
 lib/display_options.c         |   3 +-
 net/net.c                     |   8 +-
 38 files changed, 750 insertions(+), 583 deletions(-)

Regards,
Simon

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Tom Rini <trini at ti.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 01:32:58PM -0800, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Wolfgang,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Wolfgang Denk <wd at denx.de> wrote:
>>> > Dear Simon Glass,
>>> >
>>> > In message <CAPnjgZ2P6sBDXiwXW2TeCdjADMhkN5iNBGrpZbtvwMqUtYVVxA at mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>>> >> Hi Tom,
>>> >>
>>> >> This series includes the sandbox map_sysmem() feature, and gets the
>>> >> memory and hashing functions running on sandbox to allow testing/code
>>> >> coverage. I have run it through buildman and it seems clean, with the
>>> >> proviso that I don't have fully-working toolchains for all
>>> >> architectures.
>>> >
>>> > NAK. It is not correct to push changes that affect global code
>>> > through a arch-specific custodian tree, especially if the submitter
>>> > of the patche(es) is identical to the custodian of the very tree, and
>>> > even more so if there have been not ANY independent Acked-by: or at
>>> > least Tested-by: messages.
>>> >
>>> > This is NOT how the peer review process is supposed to work!!
>>> >
>>> > Especially as a custodian you must not do such things.
>>>
>>> OK, I was not quite sure what to do, so may have misunderstood Tom's
>>> instructions - there is a short thread here
>>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/153342
>>>
>>> I have created a patchwork bundle instead.
>>>
>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/sjg/sandbox-mem/
>>
>> OK, I thought I said, but maybe I didn't, I'm OK with re-using the tree,
>> but _not_ the master branch,  u-boot-x86/sandbox would have been fine.
>
> Yes, you said "toss it into a branch in u-boot-x86.git". It did cross
> my mind to use something other than master, but I wasn't sure if that
> was OK in U-Boot. I know for next time.
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
>>
>> --
>> Tom