[U-Boot] [[PATCH v2 3/6] ARM: OMAP5: USB: Add OMAP5 common USB EHCI information

[Sricharan R]

On Thursday 11 July 2013 02:25 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 07/11/2013 11:35 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
>> On Thursday 11 July 2013 01:28 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>> On 07/11/2013 06:51 AM, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>>> On Thursday 11 July 2013 01:35 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>>> * Enable the OMAP5 EHCI host clocks
>>>>> * Add OMAP5 EHCI register definitions
>>>>> * Add OMAP5 ES2 host revision
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy at ti.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap5/hw_data.c      |   13 ++++++++++
>>>>>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap5/clock.h |    6 +++++
>>>>>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap5/ehci.h  |   43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  arch/arm/include/asm/ehci-omap.h        |    1 +
>>>>>  drivers/usb/host/ehci-omap.c            |    2 +-
>>>>>  5 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap5/ehci.h
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap5/hw_data.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap5/hw_data.c
>>>>> index 56cf1f8..055f058 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap5/hw_data.c
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap5/hw_data.c
>>>>> @@ -412,6 +412,8 @@ void enable_basic_clocks(void)
>>>>>  		(*prcm)->cm_l4per_gpio4_clkctrl,
>>>>>  		(*prcm)->cm_l4per_gpio5_clkctrl,
>>>>>  		(*prcm)->cm_l4per_gpio6_clkctrl,
>>>>> +		(*prcm)->cm_clksel_usb_60mhz,
>>>>> +		(*prcm)->cm_l3init_hsusbtll_clkctrl,
>>>> guard this with CONFIG_USB_EHCI please or it ll
>>>> throw an error for DRA7xx boards.
>>> why is DRA7xx using omap5/hw_data.c?
>>>
>>> doesn't it qualify for its own SoC directory?
>>  We tried to keep common things for OMAP5/DRA intact and
>>  added the difference. The above clocks list was same for both.
>>  In fact there is no armv7/dra directory at all.
> If there is no directory, it could be created I suppose.
> IMHO it would become ugly soon if it doesn't have its own hw_data.
 I am not much against it, it might look clean but would result in some code
 duplication. I feel we should do it if we add another DRA variant.

Regards,
 Sricharan