[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] ARM: implement some Cortex-A9 errata workarounds
Tom Warren
TWarren at nvidia.com
Mon Mar 4 17:30:11 CET 2013
Stephen & Albert,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Warren [mailto:swarren at wwwdotorg.org]
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 2:54 PM
> To: Tom Warren
> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; Stephen Warren
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] ARM: implement some Cortex-A9 errata
> workarounds
>
> On 02/28/2013 10:08 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 02/26/2013 03:28 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> From: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>
> >>
> >> Various errata exist in the Cortex-A9 CPU, and may be worked around
> >> by setting some bits in a CP15 diagnostic register. Add code to
> >> implement the workarounds, enabled by new CONFIG_ options.
> >>
> >> This code was taken from the Linux kernel, v3.8,
> >> arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S, and modified to remove the logic to
> >> conditionally apply the WAR (since we know exactly which CPU we're
> >> running on given the U-Boot configuration), and use r0 instead of r10
> >> for consistency with the rest of U-Boot's cpu_init_cp15().
> >
> > Hmmm. Lets hold off on this series; there are some conditions under
> > which the kernel has to be able to apply these WARs anyway (e.g. SMP
> > CPU power saving), which may impact which of the WARs the bootloader
> > should apply even when booting the initial CPU 0. I'll repost once
> > that's been resolved.
>
> Tom,
>
> It looks like the bootloader should always apply these WARs for CPU 0.
> We just have to make sure that the kernel applies them for CPUs 1..n if/when
> running in secure mode.
>
> In other words, I think these patches are good to go in as-is. Since there
> are no changes to the patches, I won't repost them, unless you need me to.
I can take these in via the Tegra tree, but the bulk of the changes are for ARM, not Tegra.
Albert - do you want to take this directly into the ARM repo, or would you prefer me to take it?
Tom
--
nvpublic
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list