[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] Tegra: All Tamonten-derived boards use onboard NAND

[Tom Warren]

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
> On 03/04/2013 04:26 PM, Tom Warren wrote:
>> Thierry,
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Thierry Reding
>> <thierry.reding at avionic-design.de> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:46:48PM -0700, Tom Warren wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>> I kinda lost track of this patchset. I'd like to move it into
>>>> u-boot-tegra/next if you think it's ready, but I'm not sure if it
>>>> conflicts with/works with Stephen's 4th patch of his v2 series ("ARM:
>>>> tegra: enable a common set of disk-related commands").
>>>
>>> I can rebase my patches on top of Stephen's work and resend them if it
>>> helps.
>>>
>>> Thierry
>> The only problem I see is that Stephen's patchset isn't exclusively
>> Tegra-based, so I'm not sure I want to bring it into the Tegra tree
>> and cause problems when I do a PR. The other half of the patchset is
>> assigned to Tom Rini.
>>
>> Stephen - how would you like me to resolve this?
>
> Hmmm. Thierry's patch series does quite a few things at once.
>
> I'd suggest that Thierry posts a series that /just/ enables NAND
> support. It should be possible to apply that on its own without any
> conflicts/dependencies on my series.
>
> Enabling FIT could also be a separate series without any
> conflicts/dependencies.
>
> A lot of the rest of that series is effectively part of my series, since
> I ended up enabling all those new options in the various common Tegra
> config files in my series.
>
> The only thing left over is the removal of the custom definition of
> CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND in the AD headers. That should happen after my series.
>
> Re: How to get my series into Tegra's tree. I think it'd be fine to
> apply my series to the Tegra tree even though it touches disk/partition
> code if you can get the/a maintainer for that code to ack it. Probably
> someone like Tom Rini. That way, Thierry's CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND changes
> wouldn't have to wait long I hope.
Sorry, kinda dropped the ball on this while I was working on the padcfg changes.

Tom Rini - do you agree with Stephen's approach for the disk parts of
his patchset? If so, I can apply it to u-boot-tegra/next today & push.

Thierry - assuming the above happens, can you rework/split your
patchset as Stephen outlines above? Then I can apply your patches &
push and we'll be ready for a PR early next week after some
testing/MAKEALL/etc.

Thanks,

Tom