[U-Boot] [PATCH] mmc:sdhci:fix: Change default interrupts enabled at SDHCI initialization

[Minkyu Kang]

Dear Lukasz,

On 11/03/13 17:22, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 02/21/2013 06:33 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>>>> Hi Tom,
>>>>
>>>> On 02/22/2013 02:45 AM, Tom Rini wrote: On 02/21/2013 12:21 PM,
>>>> Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>>>>>>> Dear All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd like to kindly ask for any feedback on this patch.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is now more than month on the u-boot mailing list...
>>>>
>>>> OK, sorry, the generic name of the driver threw me for a minute.
>>>> I'm fine with this change going up u-boot-samsung -> u-boot-arm ->
>>>> master since it's a samsung-only driver right now.  Does this work
>>>> for you?
>>>>> I think that this driver didn't use samsung-only. going up
>>>>> u-boot-samsung? I'm not sure that.
>>>
>>> Unless the context got very wrong, it touches drivers/mmc/sdhci.c
>>> which is controlled by CONFIG_SDHCI which is only turned on in what
>>> look like samsung platforms to me.
>>>
>>
>> There is a /asm/arch-pantheon/config.h file which sets the
>> CONFIG_SDHCI flag. It was added by Lei Wen (who is CC'ed to this
>> thread) and looks like ARM926EJS (Marwell Semiconductor) processor
>> based system.
>>
>> Other systems are indeed samsung based processors. 
>>
>> I don't mind if this patch would go via u-boot-samsung tree.
>>
>> Moreover, since this change "touches" Lei system, I think that he
>> should have expressed his opinion. Sadly this didn't happened....
> 
> Any feedback? If not, please pull this patch to u-boot mainline.
> 
> Today it is 2 months since this patch has been posted on ML. No reply
> from interested people.
> 

Since Andy seems absent, applied to u-boot-samsung.

Thanks,
Minkyu Kang.