[U-Boot] [PATCH v9 15/30] autoconfig.mk: Make it possible to define configs from other configs

Benoît Thébaudeau benoit.thebaudeau at advansee.com
Wed Mar 13 14:35:49 CET 2013


Hi Stefano,

On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 9:01:47 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 08/03/2013 15:54, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Tom Rini <trini at ti.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> I think the giant list from Benoit got lost.  It's a HUGE thing to
> >> change.  I think we should just accept that config variables are mixed
> >> case, or at least not block this patch on a very large unrelated fixup.
> > 
> > Agreed. Benoit's patch series contains 30 patches and it is at version 9.
> > 
> > It would be better to treat this fixup seperately.
> > 
> 
> Agree with you, this is my proposal to go on. I think we can also try to
> split patches for area of competence, with patchsets for i.MX, for ARM
> and for general. And maybe merging patches that are laready passed the
> review.
> 
> For that, patches 1 until 9 are related to i.MX and mainly to the NAND
> for i.MX. They get already Scott's ACK. IMHO they are independent from
> the rest of the patchset and they can be merged now. My proposal is that
> I merge this part and for the next iteration the number of patches will
> be reduced ;-)
> 
> > Currently mx31pdk is broken in mainline and Benoit's series fixes it,
> > so hopefully this can make into 2013.04.
> 
> Let's see what we can do ;-)

Yes, it could be split as you suggest, but it has already been reviewed and
tested by several people, so I'm not sure if we still have to wait for anything
before applying. Albert seemed to agree for this v9 for the arm bits, but he has
not given his formal ack yet. Albert, is everything OK for you?

The sooner it is applied, the longer people will have to test before the
release.

Best regards,
Benoît


More information about the U-Boot mailing list