[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/4][resend] arm: at91: add at91sam9n12ek board support

[Andreas Bießmann]

Dear Josh Wu,

you'd better used v3 for this patch. It is easier to dsitinguish the
patches than and it is allowed to send a single patch in a series in a
newer version.
You could use patman to manage your patches. I have to confess that I
never used it, but I should have a look for it.

On 03/21/2013 02:52 AM, Josh Wu wrote:
> Add support for following features:
>   - nand boot, with PMECC 2bit ECC for 512 bytes sector
>   - SPI flash boot
>   - SD card boot
>   - LCD support
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu at atmel.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                                       |    3 +
>  arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/Makefile              |    1 +
>  arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9n12_devices.c |  180 ++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/clock.c               |    4 +-
>  board/atmel/at91sam9n12ek/Makefile                |   52 +++++
>  board/atmel/at91sam9n12ek/at91sam9n12ek.c         |  228 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  boards.cfg                                        |    3 +
>  include/configs/at91sam9n12ek.h                   |  232 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  8 files changed, 701 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9n12_devices.c
>  create mode 100644 board/atmel/at91sam9n12ek/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 board/atmel/at91sam9n12ek/at91sam9n12ek.c
>  create mode 100644 include/configs/at91sam9n12ek.h

<snip>

> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/clock.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/clock.c
> index f825388..5b4923f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/clock.c
> @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ int at91_clock_init(unsigned long main_clock)
>  	 */
>  	mckr = readl(&pmc->mckr);
>  #if defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9G45) || defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9M10G45) \
> -		|| defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9X5)
> +		|| defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9N12) || defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9X5)
>  	/* plla divisor by 2 */
>  	gd->arch.plla_rate_hz /= (1 << ((mckr & 1 << 12) >> 12));

Can you please re-arrange the patches here and add the 'at91: clock:
remove chip macro for plla_div2' before this patch. So we wouldn't need
to add the macro here and remove it in the next patch.

<snip>

Rest looks good to me.

Best regards

Andreas Bießmann