[U-Boot] [PATCH v7 5/5] RFC: Deprecate MAKEALL
York Sun
yorksun at freescale.com
Fri Aug 15 18:34:15 CEST 2014
On 08/15/2014 09:20 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/15/2014 10:13 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> On 15 August 2014 09:46, Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/14/2014 05:35 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Since buildman now includes most of the features of MAKEALL it is probably
>>>> time to talk about deprecating MAKEALL.
>>>
>>>
>>> I guess I don't care too much, but I would like to point out that when I mentioned the annoyance of having to change my scripts:
>>>
>>> from:
>>> make ARCH=arm jetson_tk1_config
>>>
>>> to:
>>> make ARCH=arm jetson_tk1_defconfig
>>>
>>> ... together with having to detect which version to use since different U-Boot commits required a difference command, one of the answers was that "MAKEALL jetson_tk1" still worked the same on both old and new git commits, and could be used as a replacement. This patch would invalidate that.
>>
>> Well I suppose you could use:
>>
>> ./tools/buildman/buildman jetson_tk1
>>
>> to get the same effect.
>
> True, although that command has been available for a much shorter time
> than MAKEALL...
>
> Replacing the MAKEALL script body with a call to buildman might solve
> that? I'm not sure that buildman puts the build results in the same place.
>
> But like I said, I'm not too worried about this personally, so there's
> probably no need to change anything.
>
I heavily rely on MAKEALL. I have tested buildman recently to confirm it has
most features I need to replace MAKEALL with some command line switches. But I
need to adjust my testing due to some difference
1) The log is different
I can see the err log file, but not the regular log. Buildman runs silently by
default.
2) The return value of buildman doesn't tell if an error happens.
I have to search for err file to identify if any error.
I only tested the features I used most.
York
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list