[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/3] mx6sxsabresd: Add PCI support

Otavio Salvador otavio at ossystems.com.br
Mon Aug 25 22:31:18 CEST 2014


On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
> On Monday, August 25, 2014 at 10:24:19 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>> >> On Monday, August 25, 2014 at 07:26:46 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> >>> Tested with an Intel Wireless PCI 7260HMW card:
>> >>>
>> >>> U-Boot 2014.10-rc1-16576-g4a8a8a8-dirty (Aug 23 2014 - 16:05:11)
>> >>>
>> >>> CPU:   Freescale i.MX6SX rev1.0 at 792 MHz
>> >>> Reset cause: WDOG
>> >>> Board: MX6SX SABRE SDB
>> >>> I2C:   ready
>> >>> DRAM:  1 GiB
>> >>> MMC:   FSL_SDHC: 0
>> >>>
>> >>>   00:01.0     - 16c3:abcd - Bridge device
>> >>>
>> >>>    01:00.0    - 8086:08b1 - Network controller
>> >>>
>> >>> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam at freescale.com>
>> >>
>> >> Should this output be really part of the commit message?
>> >
>> > Personally I don't see any problem with it, but if Stefano prefers I
>> > can remove it and send a v4.
>>
>> I like to have it  included.
>
> Please explain what exactly is the worth of having 50% of commit message contain
> standard U-Boot boot output, which is completely unrelated to what the commit
> implements. The rest of the commit message fails to explain what the commit
> does.
>
> I would like to hear your reasoning for your claim.

I don't have to explain. I like it there and I think it adds an
information which I feel it is valid. You said you does not like it so
please explain your reasoning ;-)

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750


More information about the U-Boot mailing list