[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] ARM: rpi: rename rpi_b to rpi

[Simon Glass]

Hi Albert,

On 1 December 2014 at 11:01, Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
> On 11/29/2014 08:56 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 24 November 2014 at 08:52, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 19 November 2014 at 20:41, Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The U-Boot port runs on a variety of RPi models, not just the B. So,
>>>> rename the port to something slightly more generic.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> These two patches are based on "ARM: rpi_b: detect board revision" which
>>>> I sent recently.
>>>> ---
>>>>   arch/arm/Kconfig                               | 6 +++---
>>>>   board/raspberrypi/{rpi_b => rpi}/Kconfig       | 6 +++---
>>>>   board/raspberrypi/rpi/MAINTAINERS              | 6 ++++++
>>>>   board/raspberrypi/{rpi_b => rpi}/Makefile      | 2 +-
>>>>   board/raspberrypi/{rpi_b/rpi_b.c => rpi/rpi.c} | 0
>>>>   board/raspberrypi/rpi_b/MAINTAINERS            | 6 ------
>>>>   common/lcd.c                                   | 2 +-
>>>>   configs/rpi_b_defconfig                        | 2 --
>>>>   configs/rpi_defconfig                          | 2 ++
>>>>   doc/README.clang                               | 4 ++--
>>>>   include/configs/{rpi_b.h => rpi.h}             | 0
>>>>   11 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>>   rename board/raspberrypi/{rpi_b => rpi}/Kconfig (71%)
>>>>   create mode 100644 board/raspberrypi/rpi/MAINTAINERS
>>>>   rename board/raspberrypi/{rpi_b => rpi}/Makefile (96%)
>>>>   rename board/raspberrypi/{rpi_b/rpi_b.c => rpi/rpi.c} (100%)
>>>>   delete mode 100644 board/raspberrypi/rpi_b/MAINTAINERS
>>>>   delete mode 100644 configs/rpi_b_defconfig
>>>>   create mode 100644 configs/rpi_defconfig
>>>>   rename include/configs/{rpi_b.h => rpi.h} (100%)
>>>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>> Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>
>>
>> I have a dependent driver model patch. Is this patch intended to go
>> through the ARM tree?
>
>
> I would assume so, yes.
>

Do you have any objection to me pulling Stephen's patch through the DM
tree so that I can get Raspberry Pi running on driver rmodel?

Regards,
Simon