[U-Boot] [PATCH] embestmx6boards: Increase boot delay to 3s

Nikolay Dimitrov picmaster at mail.bg
Sun Dec 14 21:56:21 CET 2014


Hi Iain,

On 12/14/2014 04:52 PM, Iain Paton wrote:
> On 13/12/14 17:03, Eric Bénard wrote:
>> Hi Nikolay,
>>
>> Le Sat, 13 Dec 2014 18:05:15 +0200,
>> Nikolay Dimitrov <picmaster at mail.bg> a écrit :
>>> On 12/13/2014 04:16 PM, Eric Bénard wrote:
>
>>>> This will increase the boot time by 2 seconds : why is that needed ?
>>>
>>> Thanks for commenting. My intent is to give by default a reasonable
>>> time for the end-user to react and break the boot-sequence if needed
>>> (and avoid the nasty racing against the clock for this precious
>>> key-press).
>>>
>>> My motivation for this is that I see RIoTboard/MarsBoard mostly as
>>> boards that people can use for experimentation/prototyping, and not as
>>> a finished end-product, thus my thinking that the slightly increased
>>> boot-time won't be a critical issue for such applications. Still
>>> everyone can change the delay at will if they want to optimize the boot.
>>>
>>> Other hobby boards also have similarly handy boot-timings, like
>>> Wandboard (5s), Novena (5s), Udoo (3s).
>>>
>> OK seems reasonable.
>
> I disagree. I think it's an unnecessary, unneeded, unreasonable tripling
> of the boot time.

I have 2 things to say about this:
1. In theory we can also question why the initial boot delay was 
selected to be 1s.
2. You imply that the "users" want ultra-fast boot times for riotboard. 
Being myself one of the riotboard users, I can assure you that such 
generalization is excessive.

> Rather than leaving people to patch out this unwanted behaviour, I'd suggest
> promoting CONFIG_BOOTDELAY into a Kconfig option, leaving the default as-is.

This is a good idea in general, I don't mind it.

> This also leads to a slightly less unreasonable increase in bootdelay to 2s
> from config_distro_defaults.h

Well, this is again subjective - we can always argue that 2s is both too 
long and too short for selected use cases, so I don't understand the 
qualification "less unreasonable".

In summary - I won't carry a war for this change, as it doesn't worth 
it. I just tried to contribute a tiny bit of improvement to the already 
excellent work of Eric, so we can have a silk-smooth out-of-the-box 
U-Boot user experience, and I'm doing this as an actual riotboard user. 
That's all.

Thanks for sharing your viewpoint.

Kind regards,
Nikolay


More information about the U-Boot mailing list