[U-Boot] [PATCH] mtd: nand: revive "nand scrub" command

[Marek Vasut]

On Monday, December 15, 2014 at 11:54:08 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 07:19:21 +0100
> 
> Heiko Schocher <hs at denx.de> wrote:
> > Hello Scott,
> > 
> > Am 11.12.2014 22:43, schrieb Scott Wood:
> > > On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 22:37 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > >> On Thursday, December 11, 2014 at 09:37:10 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > >>> On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 19:49 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > >>>> Since commit ff94bc40af34 (mtd, ubi, ubifs: resync with Linux-3.14),
> > >>>> the "nand scrub" command has not been working.
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> The scrub is a U-Boot extension and we have to modify nand_base.c
> > >>>> that originates in Linux.
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> Mark the code with #ifdef __UBOOT__ so we will never accidentally
> > >>>> drop it when we re-sync the NAND framework with Linux in the future.
> > >>> 
> > >>> No more "#ifdef __UBOOT__" please.
> > >> 
> > >> Do you happen to have a helpful suggestion how to clearly mark those
> > >> bits of code then please ?
> > > 
> > > This was already discussed. :-)
> > > 
> > > See the archives for why I think this is bad.
> > > 
> > >>> Instead, never again do a "start
> > >>> from scratch" resync the way that the above commit was done.
> > >> 
> > >> This was already discussed, no need to revive this topic here now.
> > > 
> > > Sorry, but these patches fixing breakages that resulted from that merge
> > > demonstrate that there is a need to revive it, if there's anyone that
> > > still thinks it's a good idea -- Heiko seemed to be in agreement that
> > > there's no need to do that for future syncs:
> > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2014-November/194256.html
> > 
> > Yes, I hope a resync works now fine ... but I prefer to mark the
> > differences between linux and u-boot somehow, because, you immediately
> > see the differences between linux and u-boot, when you read the u-boot
> > code ...
> 
> I agree with Heiko.

I second that.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut