[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 11/27] x86: queensbay: Adapt FSP support codes

Simon Glass sjg at chromium.org
Mon Dec 15 19:26:40 CET 2014


On 13 December 2014 at 21:17, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Bin,
>>>
>>> On 12 December 2014 at 06:05, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Use inline assembly codes to call FspNotify() to make sure parameters
>>>> are passed on the stack as required by the FSP calling convention.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>> - Move license header changes to last commit
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>> - Update the codes to use U-Boot coding style
>>>>
>>>>  arch/x86/cpu/queensbay/fsp_configs.c               |  5 ++-
>>>>  arch/x86/cpu/queensbay/fsp_support.c               | 39 ++++++++++++++--------
>>>>  .../include/asm/arch-queensbay/fsp/fsp_support.h   |  2 +-
>>>>  3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/queensbay/fsp_configs.c b/arch/x86/cpu/queensbay/fsp_configs.c
>>>> index a7bb314..aef18fc 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/cpu/queensbay/fsp_configs.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/queensbay/fsp_configs.c
>>>> @@ -5,9 +5,8 @@
>>>>   * SPDX-License-Identifier:    Intel
>>>>   */
>>>>
>>>> -#include <types.h>
>>>> -#include <string.h>
>>>> -#include "fsp_support.h"
>>>> +#include <common.h>
>>>> +#include <asm/arch/fsp/fsp_support.h>
>>>>
>>>>  void update_fsp_upd(struct upd_region_t *fsp_upd)
>>>>  {
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/queensbay/fsp_support.c b/arch/x86/cpu/queensbay/fsp_support.c
>>>> index 2048030..df3bbd0 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/cpu/queensbay/fsp_support.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/queensbay/fsp_support.c
>>>> @@ -5,9 +5,9 @@
>>>>   * SPDX-License-Identifier:    Intel
>>>>   */
>>>>
>>>> -#include <types.h>
>>>> -#include <string.h>
>>>> -#include "fsp_support.h"
>>>> +#include <common.h>
>>>> +#include <asm/arch/fsp/fsp_support.h>
>>>> +#include <asm/post.h>
>>>>
>>>>  /**
>>>>   * Reads a 64-bit value from memory that may be unaligned.
>>>> @@ -99,13 +99,14 @@ u32 __attribute__((optimize("O0"))) find_fsp_header(void)
>>>>         return (u32)fsp;
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>> -#ifdef __PRE_RAM__
>>>>  void fsp_continue(struct shared_data_t *shared_data, u32 status, void *hob_list)
>>>>  {
>>>>         u32 stack_len;
>>>>         u32 stack_base;
>>>>         u32 stack_top;
>>>>
>>>> +       post_code(POST_MRC);
>>>> +
>>>>         ASSERT(status == 0);
>>>>
>>>>         /* Get the migrated stack in normal memory */
>>>> @@ -121,7 +122,7 @@ void fsp_continue(struct shared_data_t *shared_data, u32 status, void *hob_list)
>>>>                         ((u32)shared_data - *(u32 *)stack_top));
>>>>
>>>>         /* The boot loader main function entry */
>>>> -       bl_main_continue(hob_list, shared_data);
>>>> +       fsp_init_done(hob_list);
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>>  void fsp_init(u32 stack_top, u32 boot_mode, void *nvs_buf)
>>>> @@ -178,6 +179,8 @@ void fsp_init(u32 stack_top, u32 boot_mode, void *nvs_buf)
>>>>         shared_data.fsp_hdr = fsp_hdr;
>>>>         shared_data.stack_top = (u32 *)stack_top;
>>>>
>>>> +       post_code(POST_PRE_MRC);
>>>> +
>>>>         /*
>>>>          * Use ASM code to ensure the register value in EAX & ECX
>>>>          * will be passed into BlContinuationFunc
>>>> @@ -187,11 +190,11 @@ void fsp_init(u32 stack_top, u32 boot_mode, void *nvs_buf)
>>>>                 "call   *%%eax;"
>>>>                 ".global asm_continuation;"
>>>>                 "asm_continuation:;"
>>>> -               "popl   %%eax;" /* pop out return address */
>>>> -               "pushl  %%ecx;" /* push shared_data pointer */
>>>> -               "pushl  %%eax;" /* push back return address */
>>>> +               "movl   %%ebx, %%eax;"          /* shared_data */
>>>> +               "movl   4(%%esp), %%edx;"       /* status */
>>>> +               "movl   8(%%esp), %%ecx;"       /* hob_list */
>>>>                 "jmp    fsp_continue;"
>>>> -               : : "m"(params_ptr), "a"(init), "c"(&shared_data)
>>>> +               : : "m"(params_ptr), "a"(init), "b"(&shared_data)
>>>>         );
>>>>
>>>>         /*
>>>> @@ -209,12 +212,11 @@ void fsp_init(u32 stack_top, u32 boot_mode, void *nvs_buf)
>>>>         ASSERT(FALSE);
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>> -#else
>>>> -
>>>>  u32 fsp_notify(struct fsp_header_t *fsp_hdr, u32 phase)
>>>>  {
>>>>         fsp_notify_f notify;
>>>>         struct fsp_notify_params_t params;
>>>> +       struct fsp_notify_params_t *params_ptr;
>>>>         u32 status;
>>>>
>>>>         if (!fsp_hdr)
>>>> @@ -227,13 +229,22 @@ u32 fsp_notify(struct fsp_header_t *fsp_hdr, u32 phase)
>>>>
>>>>         notify = (fsp_notify_f)(fsp_hdr->img_base + fsp_hdr->fsp_notify);
>>>>         params.phase = phase;
>>>> -       status = notify(&params);
>>>> +       params_ptr = ¶ms;
>>>> +
>>>> +       /*
>>>> +        * Use ASM code to ensure correct parameter is on the stack for
>>>> +        * FspNotify as U-Boot is using different ABI from FSP
>>>> +        */
>>>> +       asm volatile (
>>>> +               "pushl  %1;"            /* push notify phase */
>>>> +               "call   *%%eax;"        /* call FspNotify */
>>>> +               "addl   $4, %%esp;"     /* clean up the stack */
>>>> +               : "=a"(status) : "m"(params_ptr), "a"(notify), "m"(*params_ptr)
>>>> +       );
>>>>
>>>>         return status;
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>> -#endif  /* __PRE_RAM__ */
>>>> -
>>>>  u32 get_usable_lowmem_top(const void *hob_list)
>>>>  {
>>>>         union hob_pointers_t hob;
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/arch-queensbay/fsp/fsp_support.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/arch-queensbay/fsp/fsp_support.h
>>>> index 3e53ea1..3296a2b 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/arch-queensbay/fsp/fsp_support.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/arch-queensbay/fsp/fsp_support.h
>>>> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ struct shared_data_t {
>>>
>>> Can we get rid of the _t suffix on these structures? A follow-on patch
>>> would be OK if you prefer.
>>
>> Yes, I will send a follow-on patch.
>>
>>>>
>>>>  void asm_continuation(void);
>>>>
>>>> -void bl_main_continue(void *hob_list, struct shared_data_t *shared_data);
>>>> +void fsp_init_done(void *hob_list);
>>>
>>> Function comments for these?
>>>
>>
>> Will be fixed in the follow-on patch.
>>
>
> These two issues are fixed in the follow-on patch @
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/420827/

Applied to u-boot-x86, thanks!


More information about the U-Boot mailing list