[U-Boot] [PATCH 9/9] [v3] rsa: Use checksum algorithms from struct hash_algo
Ruchika Gupta
ruchika.gupta at freescale.com
Tue Dec 30 09:58:50 CET 2014
Hi Simon,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sjg at google.com [mailto:sjg at google.com] On Behalf Of Simon Glass
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 2:42 AM
> To: Gupta Ruchika-R66431
> Cc: U-Boot Mailing List; Sun York-R58495
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] [v3] rsa: Use checksum algorithms from struct
> hash_algo
>
> Hi Ruchika,
>
> On 29 December 2014 at 00:59, Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta at freescale.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: sjg at google.com [mailto:sjg at google.com] On Behalf Of Simon Glass
> >> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 6:20 AM
> >> To: Gupta Ruchika-R66431
> >> Cc: U-Boot Mailing List; Sun York-R58495
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] [v3] rsa: Use checksum algorithms from
> >> struct hash_algo
> >>
> >> Hi Ruchika,
> >>
> >> On 23 December 2014 at 04:32, Ruchika Gupta
> >> <ruchika.gupta at freescale.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Currently the hash functions used in RSA are called directly from
> >> > the
> >> > sha1 and sha256 libraries. Change the RSA checksum library to use
> >> > the progressive hash API's registered with struct hash_algo. This
> >> > will allow the checksum library to use the hardware accelerated
> >> > progressive hash
> >> API's once available.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta at freescale.com>
> >> > CC: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> >> > ---
> >> > Changes in v3:
> >> > Modified rsa-verify to check for return from checksum function
> >> >
> >> > Changes in v2:
> >> > Added generic function hash_calculate. Pass an additional argument
> >> > as name of algorithm.
> >> >
> >> > common/image-sig.c | 6 ++---
> >> > include/image.h | 5 ++--
> >> > include/u-boot/rsa-checksum.h | 7 +++---
> >> > lib/rsa/rsa-checksum.c | 53
> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >> > lib/rsa/rsa-verify.c | 7 +++++-
> >> > 5 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/common/image-sig.c b/common/image-sig.c index
> >> > 8601eda..2c9f0cd 100644
> >> > --- a/common/image-sig.c
> >> > +++ b/common/image-sig.c
> >> > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ struct checksum_algo checksum_algos[] = { #if
> >> > IMAGE_ENABLE_SIGN
> >> > EVP_sha1,
> >> > #endif
> >> > - sha1_calculate,
> >> > + hash_calculate,
> >> > padding_sha1_rsa2048,
> >> > },
> >> > {
> >> > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ struct checksum_algo checksum_algos[] = { #if
> >> > IMAGE_ENABLE_SIGN
> >> > EVP_sha256,
> >> > #endif
> >> > - sha256_calculate,
> >> > + hash_calculate,
> >> > padding_sha256_rsa2048,
> >> > },
> >> > {
> >> > @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ struct checksum_algo checksum_algos[] = { #if
> >> > IMAGE_ENABLE_SIGN
> >> > EVP_sha256,
> >> > #endif
> >> > - sha256_calculate,
> >> > + hash_calculate,
> >> > padding_sha256_rsa4096,
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/include/image.h b/include/image.h index
> >> > af30d60..ec55f23
> >> > 100644
> >> > --- a/include/image.h
> >> > +++ b/include/image.h
> >> > @@ -926,8 +926,9 @@ struct checksum_algo { #if IMAGE_ENABLE_SIGN
> >> > const EVP_MD *(*calculate_sign)(void); #endif
> >> > - void (*calculate)(const struct image_region region[],
> >> > - int region_count, uint8_t *checksum);
> >> > + int (*calculate)(const char *name,
> >> > + const struct image_region region[],
> >> > + int region_count, uint8_t *checksum);
> >> > const uint8_t *rsa_padding; };
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/include/u-boot/rsa-checksum.h
> >> > b/include/u-boot/rsa-checksum.h index c996fb3..c546c80 100644
> >> > --- a/include/u-boot/rsa-checksum.h
> >> > +++ b/include/u-boot/rsa-checksum.h
> >> > @@ -16,9 +16,8 @@ extern const uint8_t padding_sha256_rsa4096[];
> >> > extern const uint8_t padding_sha256_rsa2048[]; extern const
> >> > uint8_t padding_sha1_rsa2048[];
> >> >
> >> > -void sha256_calculate(const struct image_region region[], int
> >> region_count,
> >> > - uint8_t *checksum);
> >> > -void sha1_calculate(const struct image_region region[], int
> region_count,
> >> > - uint8_t *checksum);
> >> > +int hash_calculate(const char *name,
> >> > + const struct image_region region[], int region_count,
> >> > + uint8_t *checksum);
> >> >
> >>
> >> This could use a function comment.
> >>
> >> > #endif
> >> > diff --git a/lib/rsa/rsa-checksum.c b/lib/rsa/rsa-checksum.c index
> >> > 8d8b59f..7f1909a 100644
> >> > --- a/lib/rsa/rsa-checksum.c
> >> > +++ b/lib/rsa/rsa-checksum.c
> >> > @@ -10,12 +10,13 @@
> >> > #include <asm/byteorder.h>
> >> > #include <asm/errno.h>
> >> > #include <asm/unaligned.h>
> >> > +#include <hash.h>
> >> > #else
> >> > #include "fdt_host.h"
> >> > -#endif
> >> > -#include <u-boot/rsa.h>
> >> > #include <u-boot/sha1.h>
> >> > #include <u-boot/sha256.h>
> >> > +#endif
> >> > +#include <u-boot/rsa.h>
> >> >
> >> > /* PKCS 1.5 paddings as described in the RSA PKCS#1 v2.1 standard.
> >> > */
> >> >
> >> > @@ -136,7 +137,33 @@ const uint8_t
> >> > padding_sha256_rsa4096[RSA4096_BYTES -
> >> SHA256_SUM_LEN] = {
> >> > 0x03, 0x04, 0x02, 0x01, 0x05, 0x00, 0x04, 0x20 };
> >> >
> >> > -void sha1_calculate(const struct image_region region[], int
> >> > region_count,
> >> > +#ifndef USE_HOSTCC
> >> > +int hash_calculate(const char *name,
> >> > + const struct image_region region[],
> >> > + int region_count, uint8_t *checksum) {
> >> > + struct hash_algo *algo;
> >> > + int ret = 0;
> >> > + void *ctx;
> >> > + uint32_t i;
> >> > + i = 0;
> >> > +
> >> > + ret = hash_progressive_lookup_algo(name, &algo);
> >> > + if (ret)
> >> > + return ret;
> >> > +
> >> > + algo->hash_init(algo, &ctx);
> >> > + for (i = 0; i < region_count - 1; i++)
> >> > + algo->hash_update(algo, ctx, region[i].data,
> >> > + region[i].size, 0);
> >> > +
> >> > + algo->hash_update(algo, ctx, region[i].data, region[i].size, 1);
> >> > + algo->hash_finish(algo, ctx, checksum, algo->digest_size);
> >> > +
> >> > + return 0;
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > +#else
> >>
> >> The above looks good, but what is happening here? Why do you need to
> >> do something different for USE_HOSTCC?
> > The hash_algo struct is defined in common/hash.c which doesn’t get
> > compiled for tools. That is why I did it differently for USE_HOSTCC
>
> I wonder if we should compile hash.c for tools? Would that be easier or
> harder?
I had tried doing that but it gave me loads of compilation errors. I thought it would be better to leave it for now.
>
> [snip]
>
> Regards,
> Simon
Regards,
Ruchika
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list